![]() ![]() ![]() There are also times when faster integrated GPUs are paired up with a GT 710, a practice that is essentially ripping off an uninformed customer. It is possible that Nvidia and its AIC partners dump large numbers of GT 710 onto retailers which is why it is often seen that such retailers sell these cards to customers who are not informed enough to know that they are better off buying something better. ![]() Meanwhile, the PassMark data on the right shows more than five times GT 710s compared to RX 550s (5,160 vs 929). On the left, we have the UserBenchmark data that show more than 10 times GT 710s compared to RX 550s were benchmarked (176,948 vs 16,942). Data from other places like UserBenchmark and PassMark show the number of GT 710s sold over its lifetime far outweighs the RX 550's. The latest March Steam hardware survey result shows that the Nvidia GT 710 still holds 0.35% of market share which is quite significant.Īnd the Steam March 2022 survey data is actually a far less favorable one for the GT 710. And to say the GT 710 is just a 2016 product would not be fully correct as Asus even launched a new GT 710 model just a couple of years back and most of the GT 710 models are still actively sold around the world. And the GT 710 is not a dirt cheap GPU either as the card seems to retail around 50-70$ on Amazon US, among other places. While a new product beating an older one is not something that should be of surprise, the GT 710 is actually still one of the best selling GPUs in the market, and has far outsold some of the much more capable graphics cards like the Radeon RX 550, which launched a year and half later. ![]() You can see the results for the GT 710 vs the Intel UHD 710 in the images below (via RandomGaminginHD on YouTube). And compared to the AMD's integrated graphics, it's a bloodbath. In fact, in more modern titles like in Red Dead Redemption 2, it's a total knock out for the GT 710. So, the 80% faster gaming claim was probably only true when compared against the 2010 Intel graphics.Īnd since Nvidia was pitching the GT 710 as a viable upgrade to the 2010 Intel HD graphics, then it is noteworthy here that there already existed other cards from both AMD and Nvidia, like the Radeon R7 240 / 250, or the GT 730/740, that were already doing a far better job than what the GT 710 was offering in 2016.Īnd now in 2022, the story is worse as the GT 710 gets handily beaten by Intel's lowest tier integrated graphics, the UHD 710. Hence, the GT 710 was barely faster than the HD 510, at least when comparing a synthetic benchmark score. Here's a comparison of the GeForce GT 710 against Intel's HD 500 series graphics that were already available when the GT 710 launched. Perhaps the company is denoting the Ironlake core from back in 2010 that was simply called "Intel HD graphics" and if that were the case, then the GT 710 was not at all impressive as Intel already had much faster integrated graphics processors available in 2016. Verifying Nvidia's original claim of being 80% faster than Intel HD graphics is a bit difficult as Nvidia doesn't specifically state which Intel IGP it is referring to in its comparison. Nvidia's add-in-card (AIC) partner EVGA still has its article up with images of some of the variants that are offered by the vendor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |